A G × E performance (interaction, profile) plot for showing genotype-by-environment data is discussed. Three versions of such a plot are compared: the regular performance plot; the performance plot based on coded data (environment-centered performance plot), in which the environment means of a trait are subtracted from data; and the performance plot based on data standardized in environments (environment-standardized performance plot). The plots are compared for six soybean genotypes studied in eight environments. The regular performance plot best conveys information about genotype stability in a static sense, and provides more information about the environments than the two other plots. The environment-centered performance plot better presents genotype stability in a dynamic sense and adaptability. The environment-standardized performance plot poorly represents stability in both senses and adaptability.
Kozak, M. (2012). Comparison of three types of G × E performance plot for showing and interpreting genotypes’ stability and adaptability. International Journal of Plant Production, 4(4), 293-302. doi: 10.22069/ijpp.2012.712
MLA
M. Kozak. "Comparison of three types of G × E performance plot for showing and interpreting genotypes’ stability and adaptability", International Journal of Plant Production, 4, 4, 2012, 293-302. doi: 10.22069/ijpp.2012.712
HARVARD
Kozak, M. (2012). 'Comparison of three types of G × E performance plot for showing and interpreting genotypes’ stability and adaptability', International Journal of Plant Production, 4(4), pp. 293-302. doi: 10.22069/ijpp.2012.712
VANCOUVER
Kozak, M. Comparison of three types of G × E performance plot for showing and interpreting genotypes’ stability and adaptability. International Journal of Plant Production, 2012; 4(4): 293-302. doi: 10.22069/ijpp.2012.712