TY - JOUR ID - 2048 TI - Effect of controlled drainage in the wheat season on soil CH4 and N2O emissions during the rice season JO - International Journal of Plant Production JA - IJPP LA - en SN - 1735-6814 AU - Jiang, B. AU - Yang, Sh.Y. AU - Yang, X.B. AU - Ma, Y.H. AU - Chen, X.L. AU - Zuo, H.F. AU - Fan, D.F. AU - Gao, L. AU - Yu, Q. AU - Yang, W. AD - Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei, Anhui, China. AD - Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei, Anhui, China AD - Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei, Anhui, China Plant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia. Y1 - 2015 PY - 2015 VL - 9 IS - 2 SP - 273 EP - 290 KW - Quarterly paddy fields KW - CH4 KW - N2O KW - Draining the wheat field in winter KW - Comprehensive greenhouse effect DO - 10.22069/ijpp.2015.2048 N2 - The effect of draining crop fields during the wheat season on the soil CH4 andN2O emissions during the rice season in this article. There were four treatments:traditional cultivation during the wheat season + cultivation without fertilizationduring the rice season (CK1 field), traditional cultivation during the wheat season +traditional cultivation during the rice season (CK2 field), draining the fields throughshallow furrows + traditional cultivation during the rice season (CQ field) anddraining the fields through deep furrows + traditional cultivation during the riceseason (CS field). The results are listed as follows. (1) Draining the field throughfurrows during the wheat season significantly reduced the CH4 and N2O emissionsduring the rice season. Compared with the CK1 field, the total CH4 emissions fromthe CQ and CS fields decreased by 43.1% and 39.9%, respectively; compared withthe CK2 field, the total CH4 emissions from the CQ and CS fields decreased by58.1% and 55.7%, respectively; compared with the CK2 field, the total N2Oemissions from the CQ and CS fields decreased by 33.6% and 32.7%, respectively.N2O emissions from the CQ and CS fields caused by fertilization declined by44.0% and 42.9% compared with that from the CK2 field. (2) Draining the wheatfield in winter changed the CH4 emission pattern during the following rice season.The daily average CH4 emission flux from the winter flooded CK1 and CK2 fieldswere comparable before the field sunning and after the re-flooding and the fluxesfrom the drained CQ and CS fields before the field sunning were close to that fromthe CK1 and CK2 fields but were significantly greater than that from the drainedCQ and CS fields after the field re-flooding. (3) The soil CH4 emission flux was significantly negatively correlated to the soil Eh. But the correlation was weakenedby the drainage treatment in the wheat season. In summary, draining the crop fieldin the wheat season should be an effective approach to reducing soil greenhousegas emissions in the rice season. UR - https://ijpp.gau.ac.ir/article_2048.html L1 - https://ijpp.gau.ac.ir/article_2048_c10d9f1d4b2f4060c2227b15bbf03802.pdf ER -